Verified-angle construction map
Approved-view two-strand twist and low-taper map
The approved front, side, and rear registry views are annotated only where the paired rope structure, balanced front fall, full temple coverage, narrow low temple taper, small-to-medium rear sections, and partly obscured low nape edge are visible. The diagram does not invent an exact section count, hidden grid, twist direction, tension, guard sequence, measured taper height, or unobscured nape geometry.
3 publication views · 6 callouts

Rope structure and natural front fall
The front view establishes distinct paired twists and a balanced, naturally varied fall without forcing every twist into one direction.
- 01
Paired rope structure
Each visible unit reads as two strands wrapped into a rope rather than a three-strand braid or a mature loc
- 02
Balanced front fall
Front twists fall on both sides with small directional variation instead of a rigid uniform placement

Full coverage and restrained edge taper
The profile confirms twist coverage through the side and temple while the shortened edge remains narrow and low around the sideburn area.
- 01
Full temple coverage
Twists remain across the temple and side above the ear; the reference is not an undercut or high taper
- 02
Narrow low temple taper
Only a compact edge transition is visible around the lower temple and sideburn region

Section scale and nape evidence limit
The rear view shows small-to-medium section scale and dense twist coverage, while the hanging twists partly hide the lowest nape transition.
- 01
Small-to-medium sections
Visible root openings support a small-to-medium section scale without proving the exact count or hidden grid
- 02
Low nape edge partly obscured
The lowest rear edge reads as narrow and natural, but dense twists prevent a complete view of its geometry
Pins locate the reference evidence; the numbered notes make the request legible in the chair. This is an original Hairqut communication diagram, not a universal service prescription.
Provenance: The diagram uses the locked approved publication views, which mirror the formal evidence package byte-for-byte. Its HTML and SVG overlays preserve those pixels and keep every label responsive and accessible. A newer generated raster passed exact-label and visible-construction review but remains internal because its raster output cannot prove approved-pixel preservation and critical labels would not remain semantic.
